Fred Sandback

September 4, 2006 at 10:08 pm Leave a comment

“Untitled (Fourth of Ten Corner Constructions),” 1983
maroon and black acrylic yarn

installation with acrylic yarn

Fred Sandback:
Remarks on my Sculpture 1966-86

In 1966 I found myself engaged in a sort of assemblage of odd pieces of industrial material, connected in series. The singsong interrelationship of the parts didn’t have much energy or conviction. In response to my complaints about sculpture m general, and the incoherence of mine in particular, George Sugarman said something to the effect: “Well, if you are so sick of all the parts, why not just make a line with a ball of string and be done with it?”

The first sculpture I made with a piece of string and a little wire, was the outline of a rectangular solid — a 2″ x 4″ — lying on the floor. It was a casual act, but it seemed to open up a lot of possibilities for me. I could assert a certain place or volume in its full materiality without occupying and obscuring it.

I think my first attraction to this situation was to the way it allowed me to play with something both existing and not existing at the same time. The thing itself the 2″ x 4″ — was just as material as it could be — a volume of air and light above the surface of the floor. Yet my forming of it, the shape and dimension of that figure, had an ambiguous and transient quality. It was funny too — it had an anecdotal quality on the order of “first there is a mountain, then there is no mountain, then there is …,” but in reverse.

I didn’t have a highly defined set of goals at this point. I did, indeed, want to make sculpture — and I suppose that’s interesting — I didn’t draw much of my impetus at all from the American painting of the 50’s, or at least not nearly as much as from older sculpture. I spent one summer trying, with limited success, to draw Michelangelo’s slaves every day.

When I got around to the first string pieces, it wasn’t so much, in retrospect, that I wanted to make sculpture without a composition of parts, or sculpture without positive and negative spaces, as that I just wanted to make sculpture and these other things just seemed to be getting in the way.

I did have a strong gut feeling from the beginning though, and that was wanting to be able to make sculpture that didn’t have an inside.

Otherwise, thinking about the nature of place, or a place — my being there with or in it — and the nature of the interaction between the two was interesting. And at that point the thinking was perhaps more interesting than the doing, though it’s of course the latter that has sustained my interest.


My feeling persists that all of my sculpture is part of a continuing attitude and relationship to things. That is, sometimes, I don’t see various sculptures so much as being discrete objects, but rather more as instances of a generalized need to be in some sort of constituting material relationship with my environment. The sculptures address themselves to the particular space and time that they’re in, but it may be that the more complete situation that I’m after is only constructed in time slowly, with the individual sculptures as its constituent parts.

I don’t feel that once a piece is made, then it’s done with. I continue to work with older schemata and formats, and often begin to get what I want out of them only after many reworkings. Though the same substructure may be used many times, it appears each time in a new light. It is the measure of the relative success of a piece, not necessarily that a new structure emerges, but that a familiar one attains, in its present manifestation, a particular vibrancy or actuality. It seems to work best when the format is so fully internalized and taken for granted that it doesn’t demand much of my active concern. Like the ‘U’-shaped freestanding pieces that I started work on in Bregenz in 1973. I’m still using that shape. – It’s more like a tool or a musical note that I can push around until I get it right. There’s a lot of push and pull in these pieces.


Straight lines tend to be perceived as purist and geometrical, and I am forever being warned to ‘loosen up,’ as when Spoerri prescribed great bowls of lentil soup to cure me of my puritanical fanaticism. It’s a consequence of wanting the volume of sculpture without the opaque mass that I have the lines. They are more or less simple facts though, and not instances of a geometry or some other larger order just what the hand does.

The line is a means to mediate the quality or timbre of a situation, and has a structure which is quick and abstract and more or less thinkable, but it’s the tonality or, if you want, wholeness of a situation that is what I’m trying to get at. My intrusions are usually modest, perhaps because it seems like it’s that first moment when things start to coalesce that is interesting.

Most of my work now is executed in and for a particular place. It’s always been conceived with at least a generalized sort of place in mind, but these pieces are now bound to one site. This doesn’t mean that I won’t redo a piece in a new location, but it will be a whole new kettle of fish. There are things that I want to do, but until they have a place they remain necessarily vague and indeterminate. The work is ‘about’ any number of things, but ‘being in a place’, would be right up there on the list.

Around 1968, a friend and I coined the term ‘pedestrian space’, which seemed to fit the work we were doing at the time. It certainly wasn’t painting’s space that we were after, nor that of sculpture, for the most part. Pedestrian space was literal, flat-footed, and everyday. The idea was to have the work right there along with everything else in the world, not up on a spatial pedestal. The term also involved the idea of utility — that a sculpture was there to be engaged actively, and it had utopian glimmerings of art and life happily cohabiting.


Entry filed under: artist works, uncategorized.

Fischli and Weiss: “The Way Things Go” Joseph Beuys

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

An online collection of links and resources related to the CCA Connections class. Please peruse, comment on, and make your own connections!

Recent Posts

%d bloggers like this: